MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3153643646

Entrepreneurial Marketing: Mexican Cultural Differences

2017· article· en· W3153643646 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBusiness Strategies and Innovation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHofstede's cultural dimensions theoryPower (physics)NothingEnforcementWorkforceLanguage changePolitical scienceSociologyLawSocial science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mexico and Canada sandwich the United States to form North America. Although they are only separated by one nation, the way business is handled can vary drastically between the two. The two countries have a good standing relation and have always been able to come to peaceful agreements. This shows that both countries are ethically, strategically, and culturally diverse. Mexico's code of ethics in the business world is a very twisted and complex one. Ever since the conquistadors stepped foot onto Mexican shores, it seems like it's been every man for themselves. Business in Mexico is conducted in a very self-centered, and cocky way. If you need something done, the best bet is to bribe. If you know someone, than knows someone, that knows someone, you can get away with just about anything. Nothing speaks louder than having friends in high places, The corruption is everywhere and it has become part of the culture. There is no integrity, and no trust anywhere. In Canada, things are a little more honorable. Although, recently there has been some light shed on wrongdoings. But these do not compare to what the people in Mexico deal with. Canada has a stricter enforcement and not easily corrupted. Hofstede's six dimensions really fluctuate with these two countries. Mexico scores high in the categories of power distance, masculinity, uncertainty avoidance, and indulgence. This basically means that there is a strict scale of hierarchy, with man power dominating the workforce with not much entry to women. Also there is a sense of avoiding any type of change, there always needs to be a paved path with rules; almost a sense of safe playing. And lastly, no matter what society will always look to make life seem positive and opportunistic, with a sense of happiness and living comfortably no matter what the circumstances are. Canada displays high scores in Individualism and long term orientation. This means that there is a focus on individual success and future. Strategic customer service in both countries comes with respect. Being as serviceable as possible is a key component to success. Keeping those around you as happy as possible will bring good fortunes. In Australia, the Individualist style society tend look after themselves and their direct family only This leads to a high level of ethics and self- accountability. In the current paper we examine differences between the USA, Canada, and Mexico using data from Hofstede's 6 dimensional model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.371
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it