SREC‐RT: A Structure for Ray Tracing Rounded Edges and Corners
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Man‐made objects commonly exhibit rounded edges and corners generated through their manufacturing processes. The variation of surface normals at these confined locations produces shading details that are visually essential to the realism of synthetic scenes. The more specular the surface, the finer and more prominent its highlights. However, most geometric modellers represent rounded edges and corners with dense polygonal meshes that are limited in terms of smoothness, while tremendously increasing scene complexity. This paper proposes a non‐invasive method (i.e. that does not modify the original geometry) for the modelling and rendering of smooth edges and corners from any input polygonal geometry defined with infinitely sharp edges. At the heart of our contribution is a geometric structure that automatically and accurately defines the geometry of edge and corner rounded areas, as well as the topological relationships at edges and vertices. This structure, called SREC‐RT, is integrated in a ray‐tracing‐based acceleration structure in order to determine the region of interest of each rounded edge and corner. It allows systematic rounding of all edges and vertices without increasing the 3D scene geometric complexity. While the underlying rounded geometry can be of any type, we propose a practical ray‐edge and ray‐corner intersection based on parametric surfaces. We analyse comparisons generated with existing methods. Our results present the advantages of our method, including extreme close‐up views of surfaces with a much higher quality for very little additional memory, and reasonable computation time overhead.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".