MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3153732611 · doi:10.1177/10935266211009101

Pediatric Glial Tumors

2021· article· en· W3153732611 on OpenAlexaff
Angela N. Viaene, Mariarita Santi, Cynthia Hawkins

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric and Developmental Pathology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGliomaOligodendroglial TumorPathologyImmunohistochemistryMedicineOligodendrogliomaAstrocytomaCancer research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pediatric glial tumors are unique from their adult counterparts. This important distinction is recognized and incorporated into the World Health Organization classification of central nervous system tumors and applies to both high- and low-grade gliomas, incorporating their specific molecular profiles. Molecular alterations in pediatric high-grade gliomas provide important prognostic information, for example in H3 K27M-mutant tumors. The integration of molecular information is also important for pediatric low-grade gliomas due to their overlapping morphologies and the prognostic and therapeutic implications of these molecular alterations. In this paper, we cover a variety of glial tumors, encompassing neoplasms with predominantly glial histology, astrocytic tumors, oligodendroglial tumors, and mixed glioneuronal tumors. Considering the complexity of this evolving field, the purpose of this article is to offer a practical approach to the diagnosis of pediatric gliomas, including the selection of the most appropriate molecular surrogate immunohistochemical stains, basic molecular studies, and more sophisticated techniques if needed. The goal is to reach a rapid, sound diagnosis, helping guide clinical decision-making regarding prognosis and potential therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.592

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric and Developmental PathologySame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207