Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pediatric glial tumors are unique from their adult counterparts. This important distinction is recognized and incorporated into the World Health Organization classification of central nervous system tumors and applies to both high- and low-grade gliomas, incorporating their specific molecular profiles. Molecular alterations in pediatric high-grade gliomas provide important prognostic information, for example in H3 K27M-mutant tumors. The integration of molecular information is also important for pediatric low-grade gliomas due to their overlapping morphologies and the prognostic and therapeutic implications of these molecular alterations. In this paper, we cover a variety of glial tumors, encompassing neoplasms with predominantly glial histology, astrocytic tumors, oligodendroglial tumors, and mixed glioneuronal tumors. Considering the complexity of this evolving field, the purpose of this article is to offer a practical approach to the diagnosis of pediatric gliomas, including the selection of the most appropriate molecular surrogate immunohistochemical stains, basic molecular studies, and more sophisticated techniques if needed. The goal is to reach a rapid, sound diagnosis, helping guide clinical decision-making regarding prognosis and potential therapies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".