Impact of obstructive sleep apnoea and intermittent hypoxia on blood rheology: a translational study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Haemorheological alterations are reported in obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and reversed with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), observations potentially explained by intermittent hypoxia (IH)-induced oxidative stress. Our objective was to investigate whether IH causes haemorheological alterationsviaoxidative stress. Methods Wistar rats were exposed to normoxia (n=7) or IH (n=8) for 14 days. 23 moderate-to-severe OSA patients were assessed at three time-points: baseline, after randomisation to either 2 weeks of nocturnal oxygen (n=13) or no treatment (n=10) and after 1 month of CPAP treatment (n=17). Furthermore, an OSA-free control group (n=13) was assessed at baseline and after time-matched follow-up. We measured haemorheological parameters (haematocrit, blood viscosity, plasma viscosity (rats only), erythrocyte aggregation and deformability (humans only)) and redox balance (superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase, protein oxidation (advanced oxidation protein products (AOPPs)) and lipid peroxidation (malondialdehyde)). We also tested the haemorheological sensitivity of erythrocytes to reactive oxygen species (ROS) in our human participants using the oxidantt-butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP). Results In rats, IH increased blood viscosity by increasing haematocrit without altering the haemorheological properties of erythrocytes. IH also reduced SOD activity and increased AOPPs. In humans, baseline haemorheological properties were similar between patients and control participants, and properties were unaltered following oxygen and CPAP, except erythrocyte deformability was reduced following oxygen therapy. Redox balance was comparable between patients and control participants. At baseline, TBHP induced a greater reduction of erythrocyte deformability in patients while CPAP reduced TBHP-induced increase in aggregation strength. Conclusions IH and OSAper sedo not cause haemorheological alterations despite the presence of oxidative stress or higher sensitivity to ROS, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".