MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3154419473 · doi:10.3917/vse.210.0128

Entretien avec Lahou Keita, spécialisée en ingénierie de la maintenance aéronautique et entrepreneure fondatrice avec sa sœur Fatou Keita de Keitas Systems au Canada

2021· article· fr· W3154419473 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Éric Vernier, Gérard Akrikpan Kokou Dokou

Bibliographic record

VenueVie & sciences de l entreprise · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare Systems and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesAviationArtLibrary sciencePolitical scienceEngineeringComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lahou Keita est Inspectrice avion (inspections achats / ventes d’avions), spécialisée en ingénierie de la maintenance aéronautique. Elle a débuté sa carrière aéronautique aux Aéroports de Paris, à Roissy Charles de Gaulle, au département de centrage des avions. Lahou Keita a continué son cursus au support Clients pour la gestion de maintenance chez Dassault Falcon Service (filiale de Dassault Aviation) à l’aéroport du Bourget. Elle a poursuivi sa carrière en Suisse (à Genève) dans des centres de maintenance tels que Ruag Aviation et Jet Aviation. Diplômée en langues étrangères appliquées, Lahou Keita est polyglotte, et parle notamment le finnois. La société Keitas Systems France a été constituée à Nantes en 2011. L’entreprise Keitas Systems Canada a été créée quant à elle à Québec en 2019. Depuis 2011, Keitas Systems a pour objectifs d’améliorer le quotidien des centres de maintenance aéronautique et des opérateurs d’avions du monde entier : réductions des coûts, optimisation de la chaîne de valeur…

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.193
Threshold uncertainty score0.389

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0710.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVie & sciences de l entrepriseSame topicHealthcare Systems and PracticesFrench-language works237,207