MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W315443254 · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b02106

Strengthening the Link between Life Cycle Assessment and Indicators for Absolute Sustainability To Support Development within Planetary Boundaries

2015· article· en· W315443254 on OpenAlexaff
Anders Bjørn, Miriam L. Diamond, Mikołaj Owsianiak, Benoît Verzat, Michael Zwicky Hauschild

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Science & Technology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitationLibrary scienceSustainabilityPhoneWorld Wide WebEngineeringComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVViewpointNEXTStrengthening the Link between Life Cycle Assessment and Indicators for Absolute Sustainability To Support Development within Planetary BoundariesAnders Bjørn*†, Miriam Diamond‡, Mikołaj Owsianiak†, Benoît Verzat§, and Michael Zwicky Hauschild†View Author Information† DTU Management Engineering, Quantitative Sustainability Assessment, Technical University of Denmark, Produktionstorvet, Building 424, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark‡ Department of Earth Sciences, University Of Toronto, 22 Russell St., Toronto, Ontario M5S 3B1, Canada§ Quantis Lyon, c/o Locaux Motiv, 10 bis, rue Jangot, 69007 Lyon, France*Phone: +45 50808929; e-mail: [email protected]Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 11, 6370–6371Publication Date (Web):May 21, 2015Publication History Received27 April 2015Published online21 May 2015Published inissue 2 June 2015https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5b02106https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02106newsACS PublicationsCopyright © 2015 American Chemical Society. This publication is available under these Terms of Use. Request reuse permissions This publication is free to access through this site. Learn MoreArticle Views5213Altmetric-Citations68LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail PDF (627 KB) Get e-AlertscloseSUBJECTS:Drinking water,Planets,Sustainability,Testing and assessment Get e-Alerts

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.047
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.093
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.249

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0470.093
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0090.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0100.021
Open science0.0020.008
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations94
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Science & TechnologySame topicEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207