Barcoded Competitive Clone-Initiating Cell (BC-CIC) Analysis Reveals Differences in Ovarian Cancer Cell Genotype and Niche Specific Clonal Fitness During Growth and Metastasis In Vivo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract During oncogenesis, pathogenic clones develop which contain cells capable of spreading throughout the body, ultimately compromising vital organ functions and physiology. Understanding how metastatic clones develop and spread is critical for improving cancer treatments. However, our understanding of these processes has been hampered by a paucity of quantitative methodologies to comprehensively map, track and characterize such clones. To address this shortcoming, we have developed a DNA barcoding and next-generation sequencing based system-wide clonal tracking technology integrated with a computational data analysis pipeline called Clone-Initiating Cell (CIC) Calculator. The CIC Calculator interfaces with the CIC Morbus Mandala (CIC-MM) plot, a novel tool to visually comprehend and detect four distinct categories that explains their complex relationships with various tissues/organ sites. Further, we describe machine learning approaches to study CIC number, frequency, and estimate clone size and distribution demonstrating distinct growth patterns, and their inter-relationships and their routes of metastatic spread at clonal resolution. We demonstrate these methodologies, using our novel multifunctional lentiviral barcode libraries, and specifically barcoded tubal-ovarian metastatic OVCAR5 cell lines (engineered to express varying levels of metastasis promoting LRRC15 gene) and co-injected cells in a competitive CIC assay into tubal or ovarian sites in highly immunodeficient NSG mice. DNA was isolated from primary tumors, omental/bowel metastasis and system-wide anatomical site/organs. Amplicon sequencing libraries were constructed with spike-in-control barcodes (serving as internal calibration controls) to estimate absolute clone sizes. The computational pipeline CIC Calculator was then used to deconvolute and filter the data, set stringent thresholds, and generate high-quality information on CIC numbers and frequencies, clone sizes, linkages across sites and classify clones based on their extent of metastatic activity. Using of CIC-MM plot, statistical models and machine learning approaches, we generated high-resolution clonal maps of metastasis for each animal. The information generated included clone types and system-wide metastasis, similar and dissimilar clonal patterns of dominance at heterotopic sites and their routes of metastases. The data revealed previously unknown influences of cellular genotype and their implanted sites on selecting certain clones with specific system-wide clonal patterns, and identified rare LRRC15 expressor clones (classified as CIC.Toti) predisposed to exploit ‘all’ sites, albeit at varying degrees of dominance. The genomic technology and computational methodology described here are tissue-agnostic. They enable rapid adoption for an investigation into various stages of system-wide metastasis and growth of transplantable malignant cells at the highest clonal resolution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".