MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3154567519 · doi:10.3171/2020.11.peds20574

The efficacy of neurosurgical intervention on sleep-disordered breathing in pediatric patients with Chiari malformation type I

2021· article· en· W3154567519 on OpenAlex
Giorge Voutsas, Aaron St‐Laurent, Crystal Hutchinson, Reshma Amin, James M. Drake, Indra Narang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurosurgery Pediatrics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Dysraphism and Malformations
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePolysomnographyObstructive sleep apneaForamen magnumChiari malformationBreathingDecompressionRetrospective cohort studySleep apneaNeurosurgerySleep studyPediatricsSurgeryApneaAnesthesiaMagnetic resonance imagingSyringomyelia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Chiari malformation type I (CM-I) involves the herniation of the cerebellar tonsils through the foramen magnum. CM-I is associated with both obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and central sleep apnea (CSA) in children. The primary management of symptomatic CM-I remains surgical decompression. There is, however, a paucity of data evaluating the efficacy of decompression surgery on outcomes related to sleep-disordered breathing (SDB). The objective of this study was to evaluate SDB outcomes, specifically the need for respiratory support following decompression in pediatric patients with CM-I. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of all children diagnosed with CM-I when younger than 18 years of age who had polysomnography (PSG) studies pre- and postsurgery, between January 2008 and October 2018 at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto. Patient demographics, symptoms, PSG data, ongoing respiratory support, and surgical notes were recorded. Differences in PSG studies obtained pre- and postsurgery were compared using the Wilcoxon test for paired samples. RESULTS: A total of 15 children with 15 interventions met inclusion criteria with pre- and postsurgery PSG studies and were considered for statistical analysis. Of the 15 subjects included for analysis, preoperative OSA was present in 2 (13.3%), CSA in 5 (33.3%), mixed SDB (both OSA and CSA) in 4 (26.7%), and no significant SDB in 4 (26.7%). Postoperatively, OSA was present in 3 (20.0%), CSA in 4 (26.7%), mixed SDB in 0 (0%), and no significant SDB in 8 (53.3%). The presence of severe OSA decreased from 4/15 (26.7%) to 2/15 (13.3%) postoperatively, and severe CSA decreased from 5/15 (33.3%) to 2/15 (13.3%) postoperatively. Following decompression surgery, 7/15 subjects (46.7%) required positive airway pressure for management of their SDB. Overall, significant improvements were observed in a number of respiratory parameters following decompression including the following: the total apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) (17.5 ± 48.2 vs 6.1 ± 32.7 events/hour; p = 0.001), obstructive AHI (2.1 ± 16.1 vs 1.0 ± 6.6 events/hour; p = 0.005), central AHI (6.3 ± 48.9 vs 2.7 ± 33.0 events/hour; p = 0.005), and the desaturation index (16.7 ± 49.6 vs 3.8 ± 25.3; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although decompression surgery led to a significant reduction in obstructive and central events, many children continued to have persistent SDB and required additional positive airway pressure therapy. This information is important and relevant for anticipatory guidance around decompression surgery and the necessity for respiratory support for the management of SDB in pediatric patients with CM-I.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.362

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it