MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3154617416 · doi:10.4000/studifrancesi.34763

Rousseau juge de Jean-Jacques. Etudes sur les Dialogues, sous la direction de Philip Knee et Gérard Allard

2005· article· fr· W3154617416 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paola Sosso

Bibliographic record

VenueStudi Francesi · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Theory and Influence
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesArt historyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet ouvrage est la réédition, revue et augmentée, du volume publié à l’origine dans la collection «Pensée libre n° 7» (Ottawa, 1998) par l’Association nord-américaine des études Jean-Jacques Rousseau. A une exception près, les textes ont été présentés lors d’un colloque bilingue tenu à l’Université Laval au Québec en 1997. L’introduction de Raymond Trousson (Rousseau et les Dialogues ou Jean-Jacques dans le labyrinthe, pp. 11-31) suit les étapes fondamentales du chemin qui a conduit Rousseau ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.920
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudi FrancesiSame topicPolitical Theory and InfluenceFrench-language works237,207