Acute ischemic stroke due to posterior cerebral artery P2 segment occlusion treated with mechanical thrombectomy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has become part of the standard treatment for patients who have acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion in the anterior cerebral circulation. But the safety and effectiveness of MT for posterior cerebral artery (PCA) is still controversial. Patient concerns: We report a 40-year-old man with a medical history of hypertension who was non-compliant with the treatment. He presented to the hospital with right extremity paralysis, aphasia, and left gaze paralysis due to the occlusion of left PCA P2 segment (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Score 16). Head computed tomography showed infarction area of left temporal lobe and occipital lobe. Diagnosis: A head computed tomography angiography examination showed left PCA P2 segment occlusion. Interventions: The patient underwent MT and subsequent angiography showed left PCA P2 segment occlusion was recanalized after MT. Outcomes: The patient's symptoms improved completely after MT. Conclusion: The clinical symptoms due to PCA P2 segment occlusion may be mistaken clinically for MCA stroke syndrome, which may lead to severe functional deficit. MT seems to be safe and effective in treating PCA P2 segment occlusion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".