Autologous Calvarial Bone Remodeling Technique for Small to Medium-Sized Cranial Defects in Young Children: The “Switch-Cranioplasty” Technique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Reconstruction of cranial defects in children less than 2 years of age, particularly when there is an associated dural defect, is challenging due to the need to accommodate active skull growth, limited options for autologous bone graft and thin calvarial bones. We use a simple remodeling technique that exploits the normal dura's inherent potential for new bone growth while covering the dural defect with adjacent skull. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe an alternating, two-piece craniotomy or "switch-cranioplasty technique" to repair an occipital meningocele. The two pieces of craniotomy bone flap created around the existing skull and dural defect are switched in the horizontal plane in order to cover the site of the defect and the abnormal dura of the meningocele closure. The area of the original skull defect is transposed laterally over the normal dura. The healing of the lateral skull defects is facilitated with autologous bone chips and dust and covered by periosteal flaps that stimulate spontaneous re-ossification. DISCUSSION: The advantages of this technique are the use of autologous bone adjacent to the skull defect, incorporation of the autologous bone into the growing skull, an acceptable cosmetic and functional outcome in a simple manner. The indications can be extended to include small to medium-sized calvarial defects secondary to leptomeningeal cyst and trauma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".