MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3154724853

FuNTAP: A Fusarium graminearum Protein-Protein Interaction Network to Study Deoxynivalenol Biosynthesis Pathways

2018· dissertation· en· W3154724853 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Armand Mirmiran

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
KeywordsFusariumBiosynthesisMycotoxinProtein biosynthesisBiologyMicrobiologyComputational biologyChemistryBiotechnologyBiochemistryBotanyGene
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Protein interaction networks provide invaluable information on the complexity of biological pathways within organisms. These networks help identify proteins of interest along with groups of closely associated proteins with common functions. The fungus Fusarium graminearum is a pathogen of agriculturally significant crops such as wheat. The infection process includes production of harmful mycotoxins such as deoxynivalenol (DON). To study the signalling pathways leading to biosynthesis of DON in F. graminearum, we constructed the Fusarium Network of Trichothecene Associated Proteins (FuNTAP) based on yeast two-hybrid interactions of proteins differentially expressed under DON inducing conditions. The FuNTAP network categorizes the metabolic pathway which produces this important mycotoxin without the drawbacks of previous predicted-based model interactomes. As such, we present the FuNTAP network as a tool to identify proteins regulating the biosynthesis of DON. This network may also integrate other sources of data including gene expression profiles and biological function through sequence similarity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.311
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicMycotoxins in Agriculture and FoodFrench-language works237,207