Violación por internet y su tipificación criminal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En los dias actuales, debido al avance tecnologico experimentado por la sociedad, se sabe que el uso malintencionado del entorno virtual termina transformandolo en un instrumento para la comision de delitos, como el de la violacion por internet. El articulo trata del delito de violacion virtual, estableciendo como objetivo general el analisis de este tipo delictivo en el ordenamiento juridico brasileno a traves del articulo 213 del Codigo Penal, cuyo texto fue modificado por la Ley brasilena no 12.015 de 2009, ademas del estudio de casos concretos internacionales sobre el tema de la violacion por internet, como de los Estados Unidos, de Suecia y de Canada. Para lograr este objetivo, se utilizo metodologia descriptiva cualitativa a la luz del Derecho Comparado, basada en la investigacion bibliografica, ademas de material publicado en los medios de comunicacion. Este analisis busco demostrar como la percepcion de la posibilidad de que la violacion se practique virtualmente es reciente no solo en el regimen legal brasileno, sino tambien en otros paises, evidenciando la importancia de estudiar este asunto para que exista un tratamiento legal mas uniforme de esta conducta, facilitando el marco legal del delito de violacion virtual y, ademas, ampliando el conocimiento publico sobre su existencia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".