MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3154890910 · doi:10.24908/iqurcp.11729

12. “The Case of the Castle”: An Application of Experiential Learning at the Bader International Study Center (BISC) in Medical Education

2018· article· en· W3154890910 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Grace Yin

Bibliographic record

VenueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicProblem and Project Based Learning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExperiential learningThematic analysisPsychologyLikert scaleMedical educationLifelong learningReflective practicePedagogyActive learning (machine learning)Qualitative researchSociologyMedicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It has been internationally recognized that medical education in higher-education institutions must adapt to equip healthcare professionals with skills that meet the changing demands of patient-cantered care (General Medical Council, 1993). Experiential learning is a teaching strategy based on Kolb’s Learning Theory (KLT) that encourages learners to proactively consolidate information through practical applications, self-directed reflection, and critical appraisal of evidence. Based on a descriptive phenomenological research design, the lived-experiences of both students and faculty at the Bader International Study Center were analyzed qualitatively through observation and interviews, and quantitatively through Likert scale surveys. Conditions identified by previous publications as conducive to experiential learning were tested, and thematic and factor analysis were conducted respectively on subsequent data. Results of the analysis found that students consolidated information best when new knowledge presented built upon their prior understandings of the phenomenon. Thorough understanding of learning goals prior to the experiential learning opportunity encouraged learner ownership, and subsequently facilitated self-directed, professor-facilitated learning. Retention of information was highest when students were presented with reflection assignments that prompted them to critically apply prior knowledge in a low-risk environment. The implications from experiential learning for the advancement of medical education therefore can be summarized in the following points: learner-directed instead of professor-directed PBL scenarios may encourage learner responsibility and increase knowledge retention. Encouraging active reflection and subsequent experimentation through PBL and in realistic ‘life scenarios’ may increase transferability of professional skills as dictated by the General Medical Council.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.006
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.448
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference ProceedingsSame topicProblem and Project Based LearningFrench-language works237,207