MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3154994037 · doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.1c02086

Characterization of Large-Amplitude Motions and Hydrogen Bonding Interactions in the Thiophene–Water Complex by Rotational Spectroscopy

2021· article· en· W3154994037 on OpenAlexafffund
Weslley G. D. P. Silva, Jennifer van Wijngaarden

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMolecular Spectroscopy and Structure
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRotational spectroscopyThiopheneChemistryIntermolecular forceHydrogen bondIsotopomersSpectroscopyMoleculeNon-covalent interactionsRotational transitionMolecular physicsComputational chemistryPhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rotational fingerprint of the thiophene–water complex was investigated for the first time using Fourier transform microwave spectroscopy (7–20 GHz) aided by quantum mechanical calculations. Transitions for a single species were observed, and the rotational constants for the parent and 18O isotopomers are consistent with a geometry that is highly averaged over a barrierless large-amplitude motion of water that interconverts two equivalent forms corresponding to the global minimum (B2PLYP-D3(BJ)/def2-TZVP). In this effective geometry, the water lies above the thiophene ring close to its σv plane of symmetry. The observed transitions are split by a second water-centered tunneling motion that exchanges its two protons by internal rotation about its C2 axis with a calculated barrier of ∼2.7 kJ mol–1 (B2PLYP-D3(BJ)/def2-TZVP). Based on quantum theory of atoms in molecules, noncovalent interaction, and symmetry-adapted perturbation theory analyses, the observed geometry enables two intermolecular interactions (O–H···π and O–H···S) whose electrostatic and dispersive contributions favor formation of the thiophene–water complex.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.422

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry ASame topicMolecular Spectroscopy and StructureFrench-language works237,207