MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3155243679

Modifying the Stripe Rust Resistance Gene Yr10 in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) by PCR Mutagenesis

2018· article· en· W3155243679 on OpenAlexaff
Darren Van Essen, Michele Frick, André Laroche

Bibliographic record

VenueURSCA Proceedings · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneBiologyGeneticsR geneMutagenesisTransformation (genetics)Plant disease resistanceStripe rustMutation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stripe rust is a disease in cereal crops caused by the fungal pathogen Puccinia striiformis which can have devastating effects on crop yields. Cereal plants have unique resistance (R) genes which code for resistance (R) proteins with coiled coil (CC), nucleotide binding site (NBS), and leucine rich repeat (LRR) domains. The CC and LRR domains are thought to be particularly important for protein function/interaction in the resistance response. The Yr10 gene is a stripe rust resistance gene in Triticum aestivum that codes for a unique CC-NBS-LRR sequence but no longer confers resistance to some races of rust. Previous studies indicate that by mutagenizing the DNA sequences that code for the CC and LRR domains it is possible to change the R protein’s sequence, and possibly the interaction during the resistance response3. Thus, the defeated R genes can confer resistance once again when mutagenized in these regions. This study used PCR mutagenesis (by overlap extension) to mutagenize the Yr10 gene in the regions encoding the CC and LRR domains. Primers were designed to amplify Yr10 such that products contained mutated sequence as extensions, available for overlap. The amplifications were the expected size, indicted primers were successful. The PCR products containing the mutagenized sequences of Yr10 were then assembled with the pANIC 6D vector to be used in further experiments involving the transformation of wheat crops to test resistance. *Indicates presenter

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueURSCA ProceedingsSame topicWheat and Barley Genetics and PathologyFrench-language works237,207