The emergence of a complex pore‐canal system in the dermal skeleton of <i>Tremataspis</i> (Osteostraci)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thyestiids are a group of osteostracans (sister-group to jawed vertebrates) ranging in time from the early Silurian to Middle Devonian. Tremataspis is unique among thyestiids in having a continuous mesodentine and enameloid cover on its dermal elements, and an embedded pore-canal system divided into lower and upper parts by a perforated septum. The origin of this upper mesh canal system and its potential homology to similar canal systems of other osteostracans has remained a matter of debate. To investigate this, we use synchrotron radiation microtomography data of four species of Tremataspis and three other thyestiid genera. Procephalaspis oeselensis lacks an upper mesh canal system entirely, but Aestiaspis viitaensis has partially enclosed upper canals formed between slightly modified tubercles that generally only cover separate pore fields. Further modification of tubercles in Dartmuthia gemmifera forms a more extensive, semi-enclosed upper mesh canal system that overlies an extensive perforated septum, similar to that found in Tremataspis. Lower mesh canals in P. oeselensis are radially arranged and buried tubercles indicate a continuous growth and addition of dermal hard tissues. These features are lacking to varying degrees in the other investigated thyestiids, and Tremataspis probably had a determinate growth accompanied by a single mineralization phase of its dermal hard tissues. The previously proposed homology between the semi-enclosed upper canal system in Dartmuthia to the pore-canal system in Tremataspis is supported in this study, but the suggested homologies between these canals and other parts of the thyestiid vasculature to those in non-thyestiid osteostracans remain unclear. This study shows that three-dimensional modeling of high-resolution data can provide histological and structural details that can help clarify homology issues and elucidate the evolution of dermal hard tissues in osteostracans. In extension, this can give insights into how these tissues relate to those found among jawed vertebrates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".