MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3155376846 · doi:10.1109/jsen.2021.3072578

Miniature Fiber-Spectrophotometer for Real-Time Biomarkers Detection

2021· article· en· W3155376846 on OpenAlexafffund
Vahid Khojasteh Lazarjan, Anahita Bakhshizadeh Gashti, Mohamad Feshki, Alain Garnier, Benoit Gosselin

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Sensors Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada First Research Excellence Fund
KeywordsNotationSpectrometerAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Computer sciencePhysicsMathematicsChromatographyChemistryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a miniature and cost-effective cell fiber-spectrophotometer based on fluorescence emission sensing for real-time detection of biomarkers. The prototype comprises a highly sensitive spectrometer embedded in an inexpensive 3D-printed housing and a custom-designed printed circuit board to transmit the data wirelessly. Results show that this portable system can identify micro-volume samples of tubulin protein, a well-known biomarker, to study different types of cancer. Additionally, our ambulatory prototype is small in size (30 mm <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\times24$ </tex-math></inline-formula> mm <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\times43$ </tex-math></inline-formula> mm), lightweight (19 g), economical, and low-power (103 mW). Fluorescence spectrophotometry measurement results obtained <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">in vitro</i> for stained VERO E6 cells using the presented prototype are reported. A set of samples with varying concentrations of Alexa Fluor 488 were also tested, and their spectral responses were measured within the range of 340–850 nm with a resolution of 15 nm. The measured limits of quantification and detection are 20 and <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$4~\mu \text{g}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> /mL, respectively, while the measured responsivity is 85 mV/nW with a minimum detectable power of 117 fW at 519 nm. Intra- and inter-day relative standard deviations of 1.5% and 4.7%, respectively, were measured during longitudinal sensitivity experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.407
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Sensors JournalSame topicCAR-T cell therapy researchFrench-language works237,207