Roma e Montecassino : gli affreschi della chiesa inferiore di S. Crisogono
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Attention is focused on mediaeval frescoes in the lower church of San Crisogono (surviving in part), which have not systematically been examined before. Questions such as the probable date of execution, the identity of the commissioner and the significance of the decoration are asked and answered. The usual dating of the decoration to the 10th century is, on the basis of new stylistic and iconographic evidence, shifted to the 11th century and more specifically after 1041 when the legend of Saint Benedict received visual expression in the Abbey of Montecassino. This decorative cycle appears to be a key in unlocking the dating of the cycle in S. Crisogono, in providing an iconographic model for the depiction of the various scenes, and quite possible in offering not only a stylistic reference point but also in providing the patron of the Roman frescoes. It is proposed that the patron was the abate Federico da Montecassino, who was also cardinal of S. Crisogono and for a short time before his death in 1057, Pope Stefanius ix . If this suggestion is appropriate, then new information can be obtained from the cycle regarding 11th-century mural decoration and the importance of S. Crisogono in the development of this tradition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".