Manual De Cuidados Com A Pele Para Os Privados De Liberdade No Sistema Prisional Do Estado De São Paulo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Brazil has the third largest prison population in the world. Studies on the health status of people in prison are recent and describe the presence of infectious diseases, including infectious skin diseases in prisons in Canada, Switzerland, and Nigeria. Considering that some skin diseases can be prevented, the development of educational and preventive strategies, such as the use of educational manuals, is necessary. Objectives: To develop and to validate a manual of skin care for persons deprived of liberty in the São Paulo State Prison System. Methods: The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committees of UNIFESP (certificate no. CAAE 74601417.2.0000.5505) and of the State Department of Prison Administration (certificate no. CAAE 74601417.2.3001.5563). This descriptive study on the development and validation of a manual was carried out in the following steps: novelty search, literature search, data collection from medical records, content production, validation by an expert panel using the Delphi technique, evaluation by the target-users, and distribution. Results: The validation by the expert panel reached an overall content validity index (CVI) of 1.0 in two rounds of the Delphi technique and the evaluation by persons deprived of liberty showed an agreement of 98.57%. The manual has 31 pages, eight topics, 12 subtopics, and 29 illustrations. It was introduced to the people in prison through an expository presentation at the “Nestor Canoa” Prison in Mirandópolis (Brazil). Conclusion: A manual of skin care was developed and validated for persons deprived of liberty in the São Paulo State Prison System.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".