Phenolics and alkaloids of raw cocoa nibs and husk: The role of soluble and insoluble-bound antioxidants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The presence of insoluble-bound phenolic and insoluble-bound alkaloids (e.g., theobromine, trigonelline, nicotinic acid, and paraxanthine) in raw cocoa nibs and husk is reported for the first time. Cocoa nibs contain higher amounts of insoluble-bound alkaloids than the husk, while the opposite is observed for the phenolics. The total protocatechuic acid, the main phenolic acid present in both feedstocks, was approximately up to 8 times higher, considering both fractions and comparing the results using common procedures that do not consider the insoluble-bound components. Furthermore, the insoluble-bound fraction contributed up to 40% of the antioxidant properties of the tested materials. A reliable database for the phenolic content of foods is necessary to assess the effects of their intake on various biological parameters. Therefore, by demonstrating that some bioactives of cocoa and its processing by-products have largely been underestimated, this study provides crucial information that would contribute to better understanding of the chemistry of cocoa products and their potential health benefits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".