Pain, functional disability and mental disorders as potential mediators of the association between chronic physical conditions and suicidal ideation in community living older adults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine the associations between chronic physical conditions and suicidal ideation and to assess whether associations are mediated by pain, anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress syndrome (PTSS), and functional disability. METHODS: " (ESA-S) study. Path analysis was used to assess the associations. The presence of suicidal behaviour was ascertained using 4 questions. PTSS was based on a validated scale for primary care older adults. Anxiety and depression were assessed according to DSM-IV criteria. Pain was self-reported on an ordinal scale and functional disability was based on the presence of disability in 8 dimensions of activities of daily living. The main predictors included a list of 13 physical disorders identified by diagnostic codes. Suicidal ideation was also controlled by a number of socio-demographic and psychosocial factors. RESULTS: PTSS, depression, and functional disability mediate the association between various chronic conditions and suicidal ideation. Although pain and anxiety are associated with many physical disorders, they did not mediate the association with suicidal ideation. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic physical disorders are associated with suicidal ideation, either directly or indirectly through PTSS, depression, and functional disability. The findings underscore the importance of early identification and management of older patients with specific chronic disorders in primary care as they may be most at risk for suicidal ideation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".