MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3155768919 · doi:10.1093/imrn/rnab029

On an Extension of Hoffmann’s Separation Theorem for Quadratic Forms

2021· article· en· W3155768919 on OpenAlexafffund
Stephen Scully

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Mathematics Research Notices · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsConjectureCombinatoricsDimension (graph theory)Integer (computer science)Extension (predicate logic)GeneralizationMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Let $p$ and $q$ be anisotropic non-degenerate quadratic forms of dimension $\geq 2$ over an arbitrary field $F$, let $s$ be the unique non-negative integer for which $2^s<{\textrm{dim}( p)} \leq 2^{s+1}$, and let $k$ be the dimension of the anisotropic part of $q$ after extension to $F(p)$. A recent conjecture of the author then asserts that ${\textrm{dim}( q)}$ must lie within $k$ of an integer multiple of $2^{s+1}$. This statement, which holds trivially if $k \geq 2^s -1$, represents a natural generalization of the well-known separation theorem of Hoffmann, bridging a gap between it and certain classical results on the Witt kernels of function fields of quadrics. In the present article, we prove the conjecture in the case where $\textrm{char}(F) \neq 2$ and ${\textrm{dim}( p)}> 2k - 2^{s-1}$. This implies, in particular, that the conjecture holds if $\textrm{char}(F) \neq 2$ and either $k \leq 2^{s-1} + 2^{s-2}$ or ${\textrm{dim}( p)} \geq 2^s + 2^{s-1} - 4$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.154
GPT teacher head0.475
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Mathematics Research NoticesSame topicAlgebraic Geometry and Number TheoryFrench-language works237,207