Axial-SpineGAN: simultaneous segmentation and diagnosis of multiple spinal structures on axial magnetic resonance imaging images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Providing a simultaneous segmentation and diagnosis of the spinal structures on axial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images has significant value for subsequent pathological analyses and clinical treatments. However, this task remains challenging, owing to the significant structural diversity, subtle differences between normal and abnormal structures, implicit borders, and insufficient training data. In this study, we propose an innovative network framework called 'Axial-SpineGAN' comprising a generator, discriminator, and diagnostor, aiming to address the above challenges, and to achieve simultaneous segmentation and disease diagnosis for discs, neural foramens, thecal sacs, and posterior arches on axial MRI images. The generator employs an enhancing feature fusion module to generate discriminative features, i.e. to address the challenges regarding the significant structural diversity and subtle differences between normal and abnormal structures. An enhancing border alignment module is employed to obtain an accurate pixel classification of the implicit borders. The discriminator employs an adversarial learning module to effectively strengthen the higher-order spatial consistency, and to avoid overfitting owing to insufficient training data. The diagnostor employs an automated diagnosis module to provide automated recognition of spinal diseases. Extensive experiments demonstrate that these modules have positive effects on improving the segmentation and diagnosis accuracies. Additionally, the results indicate that Axial-SpineGAN has the highest Dice similarity coefficient (94.9% ± 1.8%) in terms of the segmentation accuracy and highest accuracy rate (93.9% ± 2.6%) in terms of the diagnosis accuracy, thereby outperforming existing state-of-the-art methods. Therefore, our proposed Axial-SpineGAN is effective and potential as a clinical tool for providing an automated segmentation and disease diagnosis for multiple spinal structures on MRI images.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".