Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ethical challenge of multiculturalismIn 2007, in Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, 16-year-old Aqsa Parvez was murdered by her father and brother for refusing to wear the hijab. 1 According to media reports, not one of the 12 people present in the house at the time would bear witness to this "honor killing." 2 Discussing this crime in a workshop for South Asian women three years later, Aruna Papp 3 , a Toronto Family therapist, noted with alarm, that the consensus among the 19 South Asian Mothers present was that Aqsa brought her death upon herself for being a disobedient daughter.In Canada there is an average of approximately 2 honor killings of girls and women every year 4 (though in 2011, 3 teenage girls and a superfluous wife in the Shafia family of Ontario were murdered all at the same time in a so-called honor killing).Papp's worry, however, is not primarily focused on the horror of culturally driven murder.Her worry, rather, is more general; namely that those of us brought up immersed in the values of the Western world, and who normally could be relied on to fight vigorously in defense of equality and freedom for all, have somehow been rendered mute to the creeping female oppression that is sneaking in through the back door of multiculturalist tolerance.Thus Papp writes:The ideology of multiculturalism, even among the most well-meaning advocates for female equality, tends to preclude any discussion of cultural values and traditions.Such advocates are afraid of being seen as "colonialists" and try to avoid a perceived "racialization" of an entire ethnic community.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".