Geopathic Stress, Perceived Stress, and Spirituality of Female Prison Inmates: Initial Calculation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Incarceration stress among female prison inmates cannot be avoided, but it has to be coped with. This descriptive-correlational study determined the level and extent of the relationship among perceived stress (PS), geopathic stress (GS), and spirituality of 116 purposively and conveniently selected female prison inmates of certain city Rehabilitation Center in the Philippines, during the third quarter of the Fiscal year 2019. The study utilized the adopted Cohen and Williamson (2008) PS Scale, the Spirituality Scale from Hernandez (2011), and Convocar (2014) GS instrument. Statistics employed were Percentages, Means, Standard Deviation, Mann Whitney, and Kruskal Wallis test set at .05 alpha. The findings revealed that the female inmates had a fair level of PS and a high level of spirituality regardless of their age, educational attainment, length of incarceration, and status of the case, and 27 percent were affected by GS. They differed significantly in PS when grouped according to their length of incarceration, the status of a case, and level of GS, and differed significantly in spirituality when grouped according to their age. A negative and significant relationship between the level of PS and spirituality; and a significant positive relationship between the level of GS and PS. Hence, GS and spirituality have to be considered in managing stress among female inmates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".