MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3155895117 · doi:10.7202/1073554ar

La rose de Notre-Dame de Noyon et sa place dans la technique et le décor du troisième chantier de la cathédrale

2020· article· en· W3155895117 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Chantal Hardy

Bibliographic record

VenueRACAR Revue d art canadienne · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVault (architecture)ArtWindow (computing)Rose (mathematics)HumanitiesVisual artsGeometryMathematicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rose-window has been very important in the development of fenestrage major elements in Gothic architecture. The earliest examples appear in the middle of the twelfth century on the Île-de-France and are not well-known, particularly those with free-standing colonnettes, a type which Viollet-le-Duc does not include in what is still the basic work of reference for the rose-window. There is a very old window of this type preserved in the cathedral of Noyon. A careful study reveals the importance of the form within the third campaign of the cathedral, ca. 1170-1185. After establishing its authenticity and general date, a detailed analysis places the window within the building, from the point of view of both technique and decoration. Three types of circular window were constructed during the course of this campaign. The rose-window of the Treasury shows the same type of insertion under the vault as the small polylobed oculus at the lower side, north of the nave (1170). The tracery of the rose-window is made of stone slabs cut into cusped voussoirs and of colonnettes en délit, both elements found from the beginning to the end of the campaign. The Treasury rose-window has a rare feature: a primitive method for securing the frame. The armature is fastened to the interior surface of the curved wedges leaving the colonnettes of the tracery free. This system seems to explain the presence of bilobed arches at the border of the frame, an innovation for the rose-window with colonnettes. The decoration of the rose-window is linked to the secondary decoration of the portal of the annex of the north arm of the transept, under the rose-window, as well as to the very ornate high part of the choir. The execution of the rose-window can be dated between these points, ca. 1170-1175. The archivolt of the rose-window includes the mascaron, a very important motif in the decoration of the cathedral of Noyon and also associated with the earliest rose-windows (Saint-Denis, ca. 1140). The workshop of Noyon is an important center in the development of Gothic architecture, particularly for the treatment of its windows grouped by pairs in the double walls system of the transept or composed with an oculus over twin lancets in the Bishop’s chapel. This last formula is recognized as the most direct source for the composition of the high windows of the nave of Chartres cathedral. However at Chartres the rose-window hollows out the entire wall beneath the formeret or the vault, often considered an original creation of the Master of Chartres. This type of piercing, however, was also used in the workshop of Noyon for the rose-window of the Treasury. The study of that rose-window accentuates, through this fact, the importance of the workshop in the development of the large elaborate gothic window.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.185

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRACAR Revue d art canadienne→Same topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis→French-language works237,207→