Optimal design of experiments for effective modeling of atrazine degradation in soils
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The natural degradation pathways of the herbicide atrazine (AT) are highly complex. These pathways involve the metabolic activity of several bacterial guilds (that use AT as a source of carbon, nitrogen or both) and abiotic degradation mechanisms. The co-occurrence of multiple degradation pathways, combined with challenges in quantifying bacterial guilds and relevant intermediate metabolites, has led to the development of competing model formulations, which all represent valid descriptions of the fate of AT. A proper understanding of the fate of this complex compound is needed to develop effective management and mitigation strategies. Here, we propose a model discrimination process in combination with prospective optimal design of experiments. We performed Monte-Carlo simulations using a first-order model that reflects a simple reaction chain of complete AT degradation and a set of Monod-based model variants that consider different bacterial consortia and degradation pathways. We used a Bayesian statistical analysis of these simulation ensembles to simulate virtual degradation experiments and chemical analysis strategies, thus obtaining predictions on the utility of experiments to deliver conclusive data for model discrimination. To do so, we defined different experimental protocols including a combination of: i) the metabolites to measure (AT, metabolites and CO2), ii) sampling frequency (sampling every day, every two days and every four days), iii) features difficult to quantify (specific bacterial guilds). As a statistical metric to measure the conclusiveness of these virtual experiments, we used the so-called energy distance. Our results show that simulated AT degradation pathways following first-order reaction chains can be clearly distinguished from simulations using Monod-based models. Within the Monod-based models, we detected three clusters of models that differ in the number of bacterial guilds involved in AT degradation. Experimental designs considering main AT metabolites and sampling frequencies of once every two or four days at durations of 50 or 100 days provided the most informative data to discriminate models. Including measurements of bacterial guilds only slightly improved model discrimination. Our study highlights that environmental fate studies should prioritize measuring metabolites to elucidate active AT degradation pathways in soil and identify robust model formulations supporting risk assessment and mitigation strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".