MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3156024917 · doi:10.14288/1.0396554

Using the dual control model to understand Chinese and Western cultural influences in sexuality for university women and men

2021· article· en· W3156024917 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Silvain S. Dang

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender Roles and Identity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman sexualityDual (grammatical number)Gender studiesControl (management)SociologyPsychologyComputer sciencePhilosophyLinguisticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Young Chinese men and women living in Canada frequently report lower levels of sexual response and behaviour compared to their Euro-Caucasian peers. These differences are likely related to cultural factors and acculturation, but has not been well-integrated into more general models of sexual response regulation. The current investigation used the dual control model to organize and better understand these patterns in three studies in university men and women of Chinese and Euro-Caucasian descent. The first study examined whether dual control processes of sexual excitation and inhibition were applicable to between-group ethnic differences in sexual response and behaviour. Lower sexual excitation explained a significant proportion of the difference in mean sexual response and activity between Chinese and Euro-Caucasian women, and this effect was mediated by sexual attitudes. Sexual attitudes was separately associated with higher sexual inhibition and lower dyadic sexual response and activity in Chinese compared to Euro-Caucasian men. The second study examined the association of heritage and mainstream acculturation with sexual excitation, inhibition, attitudes, response, and activity among the Chinese individuals. For heterosexual men and women, mainstream acculturation was the primary predictor of sexuality variables, while heritage acculturation had a moderating role. Exploratory analyses for non-heterosexual Chinese men and women were also conducted; each sexual orientation group displayed different patterns of associations between acculturation factors and sexuality variables. The third study examined whether between-group differences in sexual excitation and inhibition were associated with sexual dysfunctions, asexuality, or sexual abstinence. The results did not conclusively suggest more dysfunction in Chinese women, but did suggest more dysfunction in Chinese men. Abstinence versus engagement in partnered sex had a moderation role on other outcomes. Theoretical implications for understanding the role ofiv Chinese culture, and culture in general, in regulating sexual response and behaviours were discussed for all three studies. Clinical implications for treatment of sexual concerns in young Chinese men and women were also discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicGender Roles and Identity StudiesFrench-language works237,207