Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient-DRL Enabled Multiphysics-Constrained Fast Charging of Lithium-Ion Battery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fast charging is an enabling technique for the large-scale penetration of electric vehicles. This article proposes a knowledge-based, multiphysics-constrained fast charging strategy for lithium-ion battery (LIB), with a consciousness of the thermal safety and degradation. A universal algorithmic framework combining model-based state observer and a deep reinforcement learning (DRL)-based optimizer is proposed, for the first time, to provide a LIB fast charging solution. Within the DRL framework, a multiobjective optimization problem is formulated by penalizing the over-temperature and degradation. An improved environmental perceptive deep deterministic policy gradient (DDPG) algorithm with priority experience replay is exploited to tradeoff smartly the charging rapidity and the compliance of physical constraints. The proposed DDPG-DRL strategy is compared experimentally with the rule-based strategies and the state-of-the-art model predictive controller to validate its superiority in terms of charging rapidity, enforcement of LIB thermal safety and life extension, as well as the computational tractability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".