MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W315611759

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT OF ADOLESCENTS FROM SELECTED ETHNOCULTURAL GROUPS IN CANADA: A STUDY CONSISTENT WITH JOHN OGBU'S THEORY

2001· article· en· W315611759 on OpenAlexaffabout
Edith Samuel, Eva Krugly‐Smolska, Wendy Warren

Bibliographic record

VenueMcGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous and Place-Based Education
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Latin AmericansAcademic achievementHumanitiesPsychologySociologyGender studiesGeographyPolitical scienceDevelopmental psychologyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT. This paper analyses the academic achievement of adolescents in selected ethnocultural groups in Canada. Specifically, the article, a part of a larger study, is an analysis of the academic performance of adolescents from the Caribbean, Chinese, East European, Latin American, South Asian and Canadian groups. In the larger study 1,954 students were surveyed and 131 were interviewed in schools in Toronto and Vancouver. The findings in the article, consistent with John Ogbu's theory, indicate that the majority of the students who belong to voluntary, as opposed to involuntary, minority ethnocultural groups excel in academic performance despite language barriers and racial discrimination. Few studies have been conducted on the academic achievement of selected ethnocultural adolescents. Therefore the purpose of this study was to (1) determine the academic achievement of selected ethnocultural adolescents and (2) demonstrate consistency with John Ogbu's cultural-ecological theory of voluntary minority groups in the Canadian context. RESUME. Cet article analyse les resultats scolaires d'adolescents appartenant a des groupes ethnoculturels choisis au Canada. En particulier, l'article, qui s'inscrit dans une etude plus vaste, analyse les resultats scolaires des adolescents appartenant a des groupes d'origine antillaise, chinoise, d'Europe de l'Est, d'Amerique latine, d'Asie du Sud et du Canada. Dans l'etude plus vaste, 1 954 eleves ont ete etudies et 131 ont ete interroges dans des ecoles situees a Toronto et Vancouver. Les resultats de l'article, qui concordent avec la theorie de John Ogbu, revelent que la majorite des eleves qui appartiennent a des groupes parmi les minorites ethnoculturels, volontaires plutot qu'involontaires obtiennent d'excellents resultats scolaires malgre les d'obstacles linguistiques et la discrimination raciale. Peu d'etudes ont ete menees sur les resultats scolaires d'adolescents appartenant a des groupes ethnoculturels choisis.2 C'est pourquoi le but de cette etude etait (1) de determiner les resultats scolaires d'adolescents appartenant a des groupes ethnoculturels donnes et (2) de corroborer la theorie culturelle-ecologique de John Ogbu sur les groupes minoritaires volontaires dans le contexte canadien.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.103

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0090.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.129
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMcGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGillSame topicIndigenous and Place-Based EducationFrench-language works237,207