Implementation of a semi-Lagrangian fully-implicit time integration of the unified soundproof system of equations for numerical weather prediction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract An alternate dynamical core that employs the unified equations of A. Arakawa and C.S. Konor (2009) has been developed within Environment and Climate change Canada’s GEM (Global Environmental Multiscale) atmospheric model. As in the operational GEM dynamical core, the novel core utilizes the same fully-implicit two-time-level semi-Lagrangian scheme for time discretization while the log-pressure-based terrain-following vertical coordinate has been slightly adapted. Overall, the new dynamical core implementation required only minor changes to the existing informatics code of the GEM model and from a computational performance perspective, the new core does not incur any significant additional cost. A broad range of tests – that include both two-dimensional idealized theoretical cases and three-dimensional deterministic forecasts covering both hydrostatic and non-hydrostatic scales–have been carried out to evaluate the performance of the new dynamical core. For all the tested cases, when compared to the operational GEM model, the new dynamical core based on the unified equations has been found to produce statistically equivalent results. These results imply that the unified equations can be adopted for operational numerical weather prediction that would employ a single soundproof system of equations to produce reliable forecasts for all meteorological scales of interest with negligible changes for the computational overhead.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".