Newspaper reports of earthquakes collected by staff of the Dominion Observatory 1906-1953
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During the first half of the 20th century, seismologists of the Dominion Observatory in Ottawa collected earthquake reports mainly from English-language Ottawa newspapers but also from other printed sources. Over the years, these news reports were used to define the felt effects and damage impacts of many moderate to strong eastern Canadian earthquakes including the 1925 M 6.2 Charlevoix; the 1929 M 7.2 Grand Banks; the 1935 M 6.1 Temiscaming and the 1944 M 5.6 Cornwall-Massena. In addition, Smith (1962; 1966) used these reports to help define the Canadian earthquake catalogue for pre-1960 events. In addition to descriptions of Canadian events, many newspaper clippings describe some significant global earthquakes and report on seismological research and operations and on other earthquake-related topics such as the elusive methods of earthquake prediction. Originally, these clippings were kept in four large scrapbooks. Over the years, the state of these scrapbooks deteriorated and the authors decided to scan their contents to preserve them for posterity. This Open File Report includes image scans of these scrapbooks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".