MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3156506161 · doi:10.3390/s21092908

A Review of Corrosion in Aircraft Structures and Graphene-Based Sensors for Advanced Corrosion Monitoring

2021· review· en· W3156506161 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSensors · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Destructive Testing Techniques
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityNational Research Council Canada
FundersNational Research Council CanadaMinistère de la Défense Nationale
KeywordsCorrosionCorrosion monitoringDowntimeMaterials scienceAircraft maintenanceRivetMetallurgyEngineeringReliability engineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Corrosion is an ever-present phenomena of material deterioration that affects all metal structures. Timely and accurate detection of corrosion is required for structural maintenance and effective management of structural components during their life cycle. The usage of aircraft materials has been primarily driven by the need for lighter, stronger, and more robust metal alloys, rather than mitigation of corrosion. As such, the overall cost of corrosion management and aircraft downtime remains high. To illustrate, $5.67 billion or 23.6% of total sustainment costs was spent on aircraft corrosion management, as well as 14.1% of total NAD for the US Air Force aviation and missiles in the fiscal year of 2018. The ability to detect and monitor corrosion will allow for a more efficient and cost-effective corrosion management strategy, and will therefore, minimize maintenance costs and downtime, and to avoid unexpected failure associated with corrosion. Conventional and commercial efforts in corrosion detection on aircrafts have focused on visual and other field detection approaches which are time- and usage-based rather than condition-based; they are also less effective in cases where the corroded area is inaccessible (e.g., fuel tank) or hidden (rivets). The ability to target and detect specific corrosion by-products associated with the metals/metal alloys (chloride ions, fluoride ions, iron oxides, aluminum chlorides etc.), corrosion environment (pH, wetness, temperature), along with conventional approaches for physical detection of corrosion can provide early corrosion detection as well as enhanced reliability of corrosion detection. The paper summarizes the state-of-art of corrosion sensing and measurement technologies for schedule-based inspection or continuous monitoring of physical, environmental and chemical presence associated with corrosion. The challenges are reviewed with regards to current gaps of corrosion detection and the complex task of corrosion management of an aircraft, with a focused overview of the corrosion factors and corrosion forms that are pertinent to the aviation industry. A comprehensive overview of thin film sensing techniques for corrosion detection and monitoring on aircrafts are being conducted. Particular attention is paid to innovative new materials, especially graphene-derived thin film sensors which rely on their ability to be configured as a conductor, semiconductor, or a functionally sensitive layer that responds to corrosion factors. Several thin film sensors have been detailed in this review as highly suited candidates for detecting corrosion through direct sensing of corrosion by-products in conjunction with the aforementioned physical and environmental corrosion parameters. The ability to print/pattern these thin film materials directly onto specific aircraft components, or deposit them onto rigid and flexible sensor surfaces and interfaces (fibre optics, microelectrode structures) makes them highly suited for corrosion monitoring applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.401
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it