Fossil Reefs Reveal Temporally Distinct Late Holocene Lagoonal Reef Shutdown Episodes at Kiritimati Island, Central Pacific
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract An extremely rare example of well‐preserved emergent Holocene fossil reefs exists at Kiritimati Island, central Pacific. Fossil reefs are rich geological archives of paleoenvironmental change. The first paleoecological surveys of two fossil reefs are presented, revealing high coral cover (40–50%) and low diversity (6 genera). Fossil coral ages suggest reefs exhibited disparity in the timing of reef development (4,113 and 1,915 cal yBP) and ecological surveys show different coral compositions (Acropora or Porites dominant), between reefs. Results constrain two discrete episodes of reef shutdown (at 2,905 and 1,705 cal yBP) as lagoonal reefs thrived, and subsequently died off, through the late Holocene. Shifts in physio‐chemical conditions associated with reduced lagoon flushing following storm‐driven changes in atoll rim morphology are argued as the driver for the staged reef die‐off. The findings have implications for interpreting past and future eco‐morphological change on atolls, given projected increases in storminess with climate change.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".