MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3157081633

Open City, Open Text: Teju Cole, Digital Humanities, and the Limits of Epistemologyand the Limits

2020· article· en· W3157081633 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rhonda Cobham-Sander

Bibliographic record

VenuePostcolonial text · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDigital Games and Media
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeReading (process)Plot (graphics)Face (sociological concept)Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy)SociologyAestheticsLiteratureHumanitiesEpistemologyComputer scienceArtPhilosophyLinguisticsSocial science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Teju Cole’s artistic practice straddles the border between digital and analog forms. By repurposing each medium’s conventions, he foregrounds the epistemological assumptions that undergird them. His work affords us new insights into how the internet and the Digital Humanities have changed our reading practices, especially as these relate to “African literature.” In Open City, the blurring of generic boundaries between born-digital and print artifacts forces both reader and author to grapple with the epistemological limits of narrative. The novel’s cryptic allusions to specific writers, musical compositions, venues, and historical events function like hyperlinks inserted into a web-based text, inviting us to investigate their significance to the plot by Googling them online. Cole also uses digital resources as prosthetic devices to augment the sensory experience of silent reading. When the links introduce us to actual figures, like the contemporary French philosophers Badiou and Serres, whose work we can then Google, they encourage us to fantasize that we, too, can aspire to the narrator’s capacious knowledge even though, like the figure of son in the oedipal encounter, we never quite believe that we can best him. However, our sense of inadequacy in the face of the narrator’s seemingly infinite networks of information turns out to be inconsequential. Instead, the tensions between each chapter’s internal coherence and the conceptual links between the chapters open up cracks in the consistency of the presentation itself. Julius’s mastery of the conditions of knowledge associated with art, politics and science come under pressure as his incapacity to articulate the condition of love looms large. Once we supplant Julius as the ethical framer at the novel’s sensate core, however, we become in our turn “the subject presumed to know” and must grapple with the void that inevitably threatens to destabilize that subject.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0110.030
Scholarly communication0.0210.017
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePostcolonial textSame topicDigital Games and MediaFrench-language works237,207