MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Pediatric Acetabular Osteomyelitis Treated With Hip Arthroscopy

2021· article· en· W3157440597 on OpenAlexaff
Lisa Lovse, Stephanie A. Coupal, Andrew Tice, Nicole Le Saux, Sasha Carsen

Bibliographic record

VenueJAAOS Global Research and Reviews · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopedic Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSeptic arthritisAcetabulumGroinOsteomyelitisMagnetic resonance imagingSurgeryHip arthroscopyArthroscopyWristArthrogramRadiologyArthritisInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Osteomyelitis of the acetabulum is a rare condition accounting for only 12% of pelvic osteomyelitis cases. This report describes a previously healthy 10-year-old girl with subacute acetabular osteomyelitis and subsequent development of secondary septic arthritis of the hip. The patient presented with 3 weeks of groin pain, elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein, synovial thickening of the hip on ultrasonography and diffuse signal uptake in the acetabulum on magnetic resonance imaging. Despite antibiotic therapy, her symptoms worsened clinically, and repeat Magnetic resonance imaging images showed worsening of the osteomyelitis with likely extension through the acetabulum and into the joint. A hip aspirate was positive for Fusobacterium, an atypical anaerobe. Hip arthroscopy, with identification of the site of extrusion and then extensive débridement and irrigation, was successful in helping to control and ultimately eradicate the infection. The patient regained normal hip function and returned to full activities. This case demonstrates how hip arthroscopy can serve as an important surgical treatment modality for acetabular osteomyelitis with intraarticular extension in addition to septic arthritis of the hip.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAAOS Global Research and ReviewsSame topicOrthopedic Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207