MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3157452521 · doi:10.1080/15376494.2021.1878402

Modeling high velocity impact on thin woven composite plates: a non-dimensional theoretical approach

2021· article· en· W3157452521 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Behavior of Composites
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of Infection and Immunity
KeywordsFinite element methodBallistic impactEnergy (signal processing)Boundary value problemAbsorption (acoustics)MechanicsMaterials scienceStructural engineeringComposite numberBoundary (topology)EngineeringComposite materialPhysicsMathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new theoretical energy-based model that predicts the ballistic behavior of thin woven composite laminates is presented. This model formulated for high velocity impacts, where the boundary conditions (applied at the external edges of the impacted plate) do not play a relevant role. This can be assumed as the mechanical waves do not reach the borders during the impact event, being the local structural behavior responsible for the ballistic performance. A non-dimensional formulation is used to analyze the influence of material properties and geometrical parameters in the ballistic response of the laminate. The model is physically-based on the energy contribution of different energy-absorption mechanisms. A 3 D finite element model previously developed is used to simulate the performance of the laminate under high velocity impacts and to validate the hypotheses of the theoretical model. A comparison between FE and theoretical models is performed by means of energy-absorption mechanisms. For that, the failure modes of the FE model are related to the corresponding energy-absorption mechanisms of the theoretical associated. The evaluation of the theoretical results is straightforward although the FEM results require the evaluation of the energy absorbed by each element that fails under each criterion. The predictive capability of the proposed model is verified against experimental results, which were obtained from previous studies carried out by the authors. The results obtained show the dependencies between the ballistic response and the non-dimensional physical parameters of the model. Furthermore, the proposed model can be used to see the relative importance of the different energy-absorption mechanisms involved and the comparison of these mechanisms between the theoretical and the FE models can reflect the different roles played by them, depending on the material properties and geometrical characteristics of the laminate. These results highlight the relevance of the in-plane energy-absorption mechanisms, which rule the penetration process for thin laminates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.939

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it