"The Written World” - Conceptions of the origins, properties and uses of literature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Inspired by such imaginative works as Alan Lightmans Einstein’s Dreams and Italo Calvino’s Invisible Cities, “The Written World” is a series of descriptive vignettes paying homage to literature itself. In an office in an ambiguous high school, an English teacher with hopeful dreams of becoming a published author tries to escape the mundane life of staying late to mark essays before returning home to an empty apartment. He reminisces about the once promising days of his university undergrad years and his mind wanders to a conversation he had in an English class one year about the different meanings of literature: the different ways in which to look at literature and the different metaphors that surround literature. “In a moment’s lapse of inspiration” (“The Written World”) the teacher writes at the top of a page: “Conceptions of the Origins, Properties and Uses of Literature” and begins to record his short vignettes. “The Written World” presents literature in many different styles. From the metaphorical tale of a pregnant woman giving birth to a book, to the dark story of a literary orphanage where the city’s discarded and unwanted literature is kept. From the absurd tale of literature being the only chew toy suitable for dogs to the romantic story of a young man who finds and loses love through literature. Behind the text lies such ideas as “what does it mean to be an author?” “Why do we read?” “Why do we discuss literature with others?” and “What inspires one to write?”20
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.072 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.027 | 0.024 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".