MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3157851091 · doi:10.1080/23802359.2021.1914526

Phylogenetic analysis of the complete mitochondrial genome of the graphic beauty butterfly <i>Baeotus beotus</i> (Doubleday 1849) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Nymphalinae: Coeini)

2021· article· en· W3157851091 on OpenAlexafffund
Melanie M. L. Lalonde

Bibliographic record

VenueMitochondrial DNA Part B · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Manitoba
KeywordsNymphalidaeBiologyPhylogenetic treeMitochondrial DNALepidoptera genitaliaSister groupPhylogeneticsStart codonEvolutionary biologyGenomeButterflyGeneticsGeneCladeBotanyEcologyNucleotide

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The graphic beauty butterfly Baeotus beotus (Doubleday 1849) (Nymphalidae: Coeini) is a rare fruit feeding species that inhabits humid tropical forests in Central and South America. Genome skimming by Illumina sequencing allowed assembly of a complete circular mitogenome of 15,131 bp from B. beotus consisting of 80.4% AT nucleotides, 22 tRNAs, 13 protein-coding genes, two rRNAs and a control region in the typical butterfly gene order. Baeotus beotus COX1 features an atypical CGA start codon and COX1, COX2, ND1, and ND4 exhibit incomplete stop codons completed by the addition of 3’ A residues to the mRNA. Bayesian phylogenetic reconstruction places B. beotus as sister to Cyrestis thyodamas (Cyrestini), which is consistent with previous phylogenetic hypotheses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMitochondrial DNA Part BSame topicLepidoptera: Biology and TaxonomyFrench-language works237,207