MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3157866573 · doi:10.1016/j.sexol.2021.03.002

Pourquoi les adultes émergents actifs sexuellement ne se font-ils pas systématiquement dépister pour les ITSS ?

2021· article· fr· W3157866573 on OpenAlex
N. Boucher Bégin, Marie-Aude Boislard, Joanne Otis

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSexologies · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et CultureUniversité du Québec à Montréal
KeywordsMedicineGynecologySexual behaviorClinical psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les adultes émergents sont une des populations les plus touchées par les infections sexuellement transmissibles (IST), mais beaucoup d'entre eux n'ont jamais eu recours au dépistage. La présente étude vise à identifier les facteurs de risque sociodémographiques et individuels (c.-à-d. nombre de partenaires sexuels à vie, traits de personnalité, recherche de sensations sexuelles) associés au non-recours au test de dépistage (NRTD) des IST chez des adultes émergents actifs sexuellement ; 32,2 % des participants se trouvaient dans le groupe NRTD. Des Canadiens francophones âgés de 18 à 29 ans (n = 607, Mâge = 23,82 ans, ÉT = 2,11) ont complété un questionnaire en ligne. Une régression logistique multivariée a été réalisée pour comprendre les facteurs associés au NRTD. Les adultes émergents hommes, célibataires, et ayant eu peu de partenaires sexuels sont plus susceptibles de se retrouver dans le groupe NRTD. Un haut niveau de recherche de sensations sexuelles est lié à une probabilité moindre d'appartenir au groupe NRTD. Sur le plan clinique, ces résultats réitèrent l'importance du dépistage des hommes, et la promotion du test de dépistage comme habitude de santé auprès des adultes émergents sexuellement actifs, peu importe leur estimation du risque. Ce renforcement pourrait être fait par l'intermédiaire de campagnes de sensibilisation sur les réseaux sociaux, entre autres. Emerging adults are one of the populations most affected by sexually transmitted infections (STIs), but many of them never got tested. The present study aims to identify sociodemographic and individual risk factors (i.e., lifetime number of sexual partners, personality traits, sexual sensation seeking) associated with the non-use of STI testing among sexually active emerging adult. French-Canadians aged 18–29 (n = 607, Mage = 23.82, SD = 2.11) completed an online questionnaire. A multivariate logistic regression was performed to understand the factors associated with the non-use of STI testing, a category comprising 32.2% of the participants. Emerging adult single men who have had few sexual partners were most likely to be in the non-use of STI testing group. A high level of sexual sensation seeking was associated with a lower probability of belonging to the non-use of STI testing group. On an applied level, these results reiterate both the importance of STI testing for men and of promoting the test as a health habit for sexually active emerging adults, regardless of their estimation of their own risks. This reinforcement could be done through awareness-raising campaigns on social media, among other strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.336
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.232
GPT teacher head0.446
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it