An <i>n</i>‐dimensional Rosenbrock distribution for Markov chain Monte Carlo testing
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The Rosenbrock function is a ubiquitous benchmark problem in numerical optimization, and variants have been proposed to test the performance of Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms on distributions with a curved and narrow shape. In this work we discuss the Rosenbrock distribution and the advantages and limitations of its current n ‐dimensional extensions. We then propose a new extension to arbitrary dimensions called the Hybrid Rosenbrock distribution, which addresses all the limitations that affect the current extensions. The Hybrid Rosenbrock distribution is composed of conditional normal kernels arranged in such a way that preserves the key features of the original Rosenbrock kernel. Moreover, due to its structure, the Hybrid Rosenbrock distribution is analytically tractable, and possesses several desirable properties which make it an excellent test model for computational algorithms. We conclude with numerical experiments that show how commonly used Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms may fail to explore densities with curved correlation structure, restating the importance of a reliable benchmark problem for this class of densities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it