MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3157961152 · doi:10.4236/gep.2021.94012

Geochemistry and Heavy Metal Levels in the Sediments of the Port of Santa Bárbara de Samana, Dominican Republic

2021· article· en· W3157961152 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ramón Delanoy, Misael Díaz-Asencio, Darlin Rodriguez

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geoscience and Environment Protection · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHeavy metals in environment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFondo Nacional de Innovación y Desarrollo Científico–TecnológicoMinistrstvo za visoko šolstvo, znanost in tehnologijo
KeywordsCadmiumOrganic matterEnvironmental chemistryMercury (programming language)ZincSedimentChromiumMetal toxicitySedimentationEnvironmental scienceMetalCopperChemistryMineralogyHeavy metalsGeologyGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the Port of Santa Bárbara de Samana, chemical residues, organic matter and heavy metals from domestic activities are deposited together in the waters and sediments. The analysis of the sediments by X-ray fluorescence of four extracted and sectioned cores showed that concentrations of trace metals such as Nickel, Chromium, Lead and Mercury were present at various depths, exceeding Limits of Toxicity (PEL) for marine sediments according to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME). Cadmium presented values above the toxicity threshold (TEL) in its minimum values and in its maximum values they exceeded the PEL value. While the Zinc and Copper values were low in all sections and lower than TEL. The analysis of the loss by ignition and the dating with lead 210 due to excess of the C4 core, showed a sudden change in the organic matter content and sedimentation rate. The superficial sediments show that unlike the deeper ones, the heavy metal content is lower, as well as that they do not represent a risk to the ecosystem by not exceeding toxicity levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.113
Threshold uncertainty score0.224

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geoscience and Environment ProtectionSame topicHeavy metals in environmentFrench-language works237,207