Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper will focus on the recent unanimous veto of Bill 618 by all forty-four of the Saskatchewan Party’s MLAs. The rejected bill was a plan to deal with the ongoing suicide crisis affecting the Indigenous population of the province at an exponential rate. The seriousness of this public health crisis has led to civil outrage at the rejection of the bill and has created activism and protests in response. The research of this paper addresses how the past and present governments are culpable for current social problems facing Canada’s Indigenous peoples today. Colonial policies and programs have directly created the social conditions that cause suffering to Indigenous peoples living in Canada to this day. As such, it is the responsibility of Canada’s governments to take meaningful action to address these issues. What is already known about this topic is that Saskatchewan’s Indigenous youth have some of the highest rates of suicide in the country, and even the world. I conducted my research through examining different forms of media such as journals, news articles, videos, and legal documents. The legal documents I explored were the proposed bill itself, as well as the Constitution Act, 1982 and Treaty 6. Through studying Sections 7 and 15 of the Constitution Act, 1982 and Treaty 6 it is abundantly clear that Canada has not fulfilled its obligation to the Indigenous peoples of this country. The current mental health crisis proves this is glaringly true; my findings concluded that the Canadian government has failed and continues to fail its Indigenous population regarding policy. This blatant ignorance of treaty rights may begin to become remedied through the various branches of Canadian government working together to create a trilateral solution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.025 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.015 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".