Bibliographic record
Abstract
R r me, a lowly prison scribe, to try to transpose the timely aphorism uttered by one of Canada's leading scholars (recently deceased) may seem a little pretentious, if not totally antithetical.But I know in my mind that Marshall McLuhan, who was routinely called a media guru and the oracle of the electric age, would have welcomed contrary insight from anyone with the temerity to tinker with his favorite toys-words.McLuhan's brash statement that "the medium is the message" turned the world of communications on its head, as did many of his theories-a term he disliked.From what I understand, he preferred to call his concepts a "probe" into the collective consciousness surrounding the art and science of communication: a probe designed to stir controversy and stimulate dialogue, a process that inevitably leads to the development of character and mental powers, which is how the dictionary defines education.Herbert Marshall McLuhan was born in Edmonton, Alberta, on July 21, 1911.Several years later his family moved to Wmnipeg, Manitoba, where he grew up while receiving a modest grade school education.He enrolled at the University of Manitoba with the intent of becoming an engineer, but quickly switched to English literature.He was awarded his B.A. degree at Manitoba in 1933, and his M.A. degree in 1934.He studied overseas at Trinity Hall in Cambridge University, taking another B. A. degree in 1936A.degree in , another M.A. in 1940A.degree in , and his Ph.D. in 1942, in , in the respective fields of medieval education, Renaissance literature, and Elizabethan rhetoric.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".