Alexithymia And Behçet’s Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: Behçet’s Disease (BD) is an immunoinflammatory systemic disease. In young adults, it is seen as genital ulceration, uveitis and oral aphthae. In some patients, BD may affect the central nervous system and some psychiatric symptoms may accompany this disease. There are few studies in the literature evaluating the relationship between BD and alexithymia. In this study, the relationship between BD and alexithymia is evaluated. Methods: Fifty patients diagnosed according to the International Study Group for Behçet’s Disease diagnostic criteria and fifty age and gender-matched healthy individuals were included in the study. Turkish versions of Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) were applied to the patients and controls. Results: According to the TAS-20 scale, alexithymia was classified as: non-alexithymia, moderate and severe alexithymia. In the classification of TAS, there was a significant difference between the cases and the control group (p = 0.019).In patients with BD, alexithymia was 6 times higher than control group (OR = 6.139)(95% CI = 1,657-23.913). Conclusions: Behçet’s disease is strongly associated with alexithymia. Recognizing of these psychiatric symptoms is important for the management of BD patients. Psychotherapeutic interventions should be planned by dermatologists.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".