Kernel Based Data-Adaptive Support Vector Machines for Multi-Class Classification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Imbalanced data exist in many classification problems. The classification of imbalanced data has remarkable challenges in machine learning. The support vector machine (SVM) and its variants are popularly used in machine learning among different classifiers thanks to their flexibility and interpretability. However, the performance of SVMs is impacted when the data are imbalanced, which is a typical data structure in the multi-category classification problem. In this paper, we employ the data-adaptive SVM with scaled kernel functions to classify instances for a multi-class population. We propose a multi-class data-dependent kernel function for the SVM by considering class imbalance and the spatial association among instances so that the classification accuracy is enhanced. Simulation studies demonstrate the superb performance of the proposed method, and a real multi-class prostate cancer image dataset is employed as an illustration. Not only does the proposed method outperform the competitor methods in terms of the commonly used accuracy measures such as the F-score and G-means, but also successfully detects more than 60% of instances from the rare class in the real data, while the competitors can only detect less than 20% of the rare class instances. The proposed method will benefit other scientific research fields, such as multiple region boundary detection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".