MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3158193543 · doi:10.24908/iqurcp.7548

7.  An Examination of the Use of Salix Arctica for Dendrochronological Studies in the Arctic

2017· article· en· W3158193543 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Anthony Bassutti

Bibliographic record

VenueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPermafrostTundraArcticDendrochronologyDisturbance (geology)DendroclimatologyThermokarstArctic ecologyClimate changePhysical geographyWillowArctic vegetationEnvironmental scienceEcologyEnvironmental changeGeographyGeologyOceanographyArchaeologyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Large scale land disturbances are occurring in sensitive Arctic regions as a result of climate change. These disturbances which are caused by permafrost melting and can damage fragile tundra ecosystems and have important impacts on downstream water quality. Determining the timeline of these disturbances will aid in the understanding of the effect of climate change in the Arctic. This can be performed through the analysis of environmental proxy records such as those found in the annual growth rings of trees, which express environmental stresses, such as those experienced during a land disturbance. Dendrochronology of the most northern occurring woody plant, Salix arctica (arctic willow) has been explored only a few times in the past, and its potential for paleoenvironmental studies in the Arctic have been largely over‐looked. We examined the thickness of annual growth rings from S. arctica from two areas of land disturbance on southern Melville Island, Nunavut. Common growth trends were found in both dead (snag) and living samples from the sites. Preliminary data show that a substantial disturbance in the growth of the samples is evident approximately 40 years ago and was likely due to land disturbance. These initial findings demonstrate the successful use of S. arctica as a paleoenvironmental indicator and provide useful tools to determine the timing of past permafrost disturbances and climate change in the Arctic. We are continuing to investigate additional samples from other sites to determine if the method can be used as a novel tool for understanding permafrost landscape dynamics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.531
GPT teacher head0.445
Teacher spread0.086 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference ProceedingsSame topicClimate change and permafrostFrench-language works237,207