MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3158199530 · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvab048.990

Bisphenols effects on Granulosa Cell-Cell Communication

2021· article· en· W3158199530 on OpenAlexaff
Reem Sabry, Charlotte Apps, Cassidy Van Den Diepstraten, Laura A. Favetta

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBisphenol AGranulosa cellEndocrine systemChemistryFollicular phaseHormoneEstrogenAgonistEndocrinologyAndrologyInternal medicineBiologyBiochemistryMedicineReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Bisphenols are Endocrine Disrupting Compounds (EDCs) linked to negative fertility outcomes in humans. The most common one, bisphenol A (BPA) is a plasticizer that acts as an estrogen agonist. Alternatives such as BPS and BPF are becoming widespread and possess similar activities. The oocyte and nearby granulosa cells are particularly vulnerable to EDCs as they are dependent on hormone signaling. Granulosa-Granulosa cell communications are pivotal for proper development and are mediated by gap junction molecules, called connexins (Cxs). Cx37, Cx26, and Cx43 are crucial in follicular communication and are the focus of this study. Bisphenols can alter these genes which directly affects cell-cell communication and in turn proper development. This study uses an in vitro cell culture model of bovine granulosa cells as the bovine species is an excellent translational model for human reproductive toxicology. To determine optimal doses and exposure times, we performed a cytotoxic assay (CCK8) and treated cells with a low dose (0.5 μg/mL), a medium dose (5 μg/mL), the current reported LOAEL (50 μg/mL), and a high dose (0.5 mg/mL) of bisphenols for 1, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hrs. The high dose was lethal at all time points for BPA/BPF, while BPS was toxic from 1 hrs (P=0.0016; n=4). The LOAEL dose was toxic for BPA at 6, 12, 24 hrs (P=0.018, 0.0021, 0.0042 respectively; n=7) and was lethal at 48/72 hrs. BPF at the LOAEL dose showed an increase in cell viability at 6 hrs which was significant at 12hrs (P=0.0119; n=5). This trend declined at 48/72 hrs but was not significant. BPS did not affect cell viability at any other dose and the medium dose did not affect viability for all bisphenols; however, the low dose of BPA/BPF showed a trend towards decreased viability at 48 hrs of treatment. Therefore, we looked at the effects of BPA/S/F at the low and LOAEL doses for 12/48 hrs. We used qPCR and western blotting to quantify transcripts and proteins of the three connexins. Our data show that Cx43 mRNA was significantly increased at the LOAEL dose for BPA/BPF at 12 hrs (p=0.02; n=6). Preliminary data on proteins indicate a decrease and increase in expression at 12hrs for BPA/BPF treatment, respectively, at the LOAEL dose. BPS shows no effect on Cx43. BPS low dose and BPA/BPF LOAEL doses at 12 and 48 hrs increase Cx37 mRNA. Preliminary data on the protein levels show a significant decrease of Cx37 protein at BPA low dose, but no changes after exposure to the other bisphenols. Lastly, Cx26 mRNA is significantly increased after BPA treatment at the LOAEL dose at 12 hrs (P<0.0001; n=5). This novel study investigates the effects of low/high doses and short-term/chronic exposure of bisphenols on cell-cell communication in granulosa cells and provides the basis for future studies on bisphenol toxicity in early development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.329
Threshold uncertainty score0.368

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Endocrine SocietySame topicEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsFrench-language works237,207