MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3158292783 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.103.044320

Examining the nuclear mass surface of Rb and Sr isotopes in the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn>104</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math> region via precision mass measurements

2021· article· lv· W3158292783 on OpenAlexafffund
Ish Mukul, C. Andreoiu, J. Bergmann, M. Brodeur, T. Brunner, K. Dietrich, T. Dickel, I. Dillmann, E. Dunling, D. Fusco, G. Gwinner, C. Izzo, Andrew Jacobs, B. Kootte, Y. Lan, E. Leistenschneider, E. M. Lykiardopoulou, S. F. Paul, M. P. Reiter, J. L. Tracy, J. Dilling, A. A. Kwiatkowski

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2021
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaMcGill UniversityUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of ManitobaSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of WaterlooTRIUMF
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Research Council CanadaConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungHelmholtz-GemeinschaftDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftTRIUMFNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsNeutronNuclear physicsIsotopeMass numberAtomic physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The neutron-rich $A\ensuremath{\approx}100, N\ensuremath{\approx}62$ mass region is important for both nuclear structure and nuclear astrophysics. The neutron-rich segment of this region has been widely studied to investigate shape coexistence and sudden nuclear deformation. However, the absence of experimental data of more neutron-rich nuclei poses a challenge to further structure studies. The derivatives of the mass surface, namely, the two-neutron separation energy and neutron pairing gap, are sensitive to nuclear deformation and shed light on the stability against deformation in this region. This region also lies along the astrophysical $r$-process path, and hence precise mass values provide experimental input for improving the accuracy of the $r$-process models and the elemental abundances.Purpose: (a) Changes in deformation are searched for via the mass surface in the $A=104$ mass region at the $N=66$ mid-shell crossover. (b) The sensitivity of the astrophysical $r$-process abundances to the mass of Rb and Sr isotopic chains is studied.Methods: Masses of radioactive Rb and Sr isotopes are precisely measured using a Multiple-Reflection Time-of-Flight Mass Separator (MR-TOF-MS) at the TITAN facility. These mass values are used to calculate two-neutron separation energies, two-neutron shell gaps and neutron pairing gaps for nuclear structure physics, and one-neutron separation energies for fractional abundances and astrophysical findings.Results: We report the first mass measurements of $^{103}\mathrm{Rb}$ and $^{103--105}\mathrm{Sr}$ with uncertainties of less than 45 keV/${c}^{2}$. The uncertainties in the mass excess value for $^{102}\mathrm{Rb}$ and $^{102}\mathrm{Sr}$ have been reduced by a factor of 2 relative to a previous measurement. The deviations from the AME extrapolated mass values by more the 0.5 MeV have been found.Conclusions: The metrics obtained from the derivatives of the mass surface demonstrate no existence of a subshell gap or onset of deformation in the $N=66$ region in Rb and Sr isotopes. The neutron pairing gaps studied in this work are lower than the predictions by several mass models. The abundances calculated using the waiting-point approximation for the $r$ process are affected by these new masses in comparison with AME2016 mass values.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207